Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Merchandise Marks Acts

Read a random definition: meeting-competition defense

A quick definition of Merchandise Marks Acts:

The Merchandise Marks Acts were laws created in 1887 to prevent people from dishonestly labeling or selling products with false information. This means that it was illegal to put a fake label on something or to sell something with a fake label on it. The law was in place for many years but was eventually removed in 1968.

A more thorough explanation:

The Merchandise Marks Acts were laws created in 1887 to prevent the fraudulent marking of merchandise for sale or the sale of merchandise that had been fraudulently marked. This means that it was illegal to put a false label or mark on a product to make it seem like it was something it was not.

For example, if someone tried to sell a shirt with a fake designer label on it, they would be breaking the law under the Merchandise Marks Acts. Similarly, if someone tried to sell a piece of jewelry claiming it was made of gold when it was actually made of a cheaper metal, they would also be breaking the law.

These laws were important because they protected consumers from being tricked into buying products that were not what they seemed. They also helped to ensure fair competition between businesses, as companies could not use false labels or marks to make their products seem better than they actually were.

The Merchandise Marks Acts were eventually repealed in 1968, but similar laws still exist today to protect consumers and ensure fair competition in the marketplace.

merchandise broker | merchant

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.