Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law

Read a random definition: Tinker v. Des Moines

A quick definition of Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law:

A motion for judgment as a matter of law is a request made to the court before a case is given to the jury. It argues that there is not enough evidence for the opposing party to win, and that no reasonable jury could find in their favor. This motion can also be made after a jury has made a decision in federal court. It is sometimes called a motion for a directed verdict.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A motion made by a party in a court case asking the judge to enter a judgment in their favor because the opposing party has not presented enough evidence to support their case. This motion is made before the case is given to the jury to decide. It argues that no reasonable jury could find for the opposing party based on the evidence presented.

For example, if a plaintiff sues a defendant for breach of contract, the defendant may file a motion for judgment as a matter of law if they believe that the plaintiff has not presented enough evidence to prove their case. The defendant would argue that even if the jury were to believe all of the plaintiff's evidence, it would not be enough to support a verdict in their favor.

In federal court, this motion can be renewed after a jury has made a decision against the party making the motion. This is called a JNOV (judgment notwithstanding the verdict) motion in state court.

This motion is also known as a motion for a directed verdict.

Motion For Directed Verdict | Motion For Judgment Notwithstanding The Verdict

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 3 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.