Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Motion For Judgment Notwithstanding The Verdict

Read a random definition: dissenting opinion

A quick definition of Motion For Judgment Notwithstanding The Verdict:

Term: Motion For Judgment Notwithstanding The Verdict

Definition: This is a request made to the court to enter a judgment even though the jury has already made a verdict. The motion argues that the jury did not follow the proper instructions or that there was not enough evidence to support the verdict. It is like saying that the jury made a mistake and the judge should correct it. In federal court, this motion is now called the JMOL motion.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A motion made to the court asking for a judgment to be entered even though a jury has already made a verdict. This motion argues that the jury's decision was not based on proper instructions or enough evidence, and that no reasonable jury could have reached the verdict that was made.

For example, if a plaintiff sues a defendant for breach of contract and the jury finds in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff may file a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict if they believe that the jury did not follow proper instructions or that there was not enough evidence to support the verdict.

This motion is similar to a JMOL (judgment as a matter of law) motion in federal court, which also asks for a judgment to be entered despite a jury verdict.

Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law | Motion For New Trial

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:15
sad. imagine being here in 2005/2010 when it was 100 operational. woe is me
@llama: back when 160s meant t14
14:16
born too late to experience full LSD born too soon to explore the galaxy
14:16
^ gets it
lilypadfrog
14:16
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/cryptanon this is one of the guys who made the website
14:16
@lilypadfrog: wow more recent than i would have wagered
14:17
how is it so that I creep a rando and their app year is 2005-2005?
14:17
2005-2006* for example
renard99
14:18
^ find that rando in your circle and ask them where they've stored all their cycle letters
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Vandy??
renard99
14:18
Possibly in a dark corner of the attic in a box
VANDY
soyalmondoatmilk
14:18
vandy A let's gooooo
all the Vandy
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Aint no way
jackfrost11770
14:19
Wow that's awesome nothing from vandy
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
what
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
fuck
renard99
14:19
@soyalmondoatmilk: Congratulations!!!
jackfrost11770
14:19
I applied in November
jackfrost11770
14:19
Idk when the As did
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
does anyone know if they usually release all at once or waht
nothing
jackfrost11770
14:20
Well I hope not otherwise I'm screwed
jackfrost11770
14:21
Anderson cooper PLEASEEEEE
For ED and their last wave of decisions it was an email all at once
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:22
ugh
gonna go cry
jackfrost11770
14:22
Ugh
jackfrost11770
14:22
:(
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.