Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Motion For Directed Verdict

Read a random definition: beneficial association

A quick definition of Motion For Directed Verdict:

A motion for directed verdict is when someone asks the judge to decide the case because they believe that no jury could find in favor of the other side. This happens before the jury makes a decision. It can be made by either the person suing or the person being sued. In some courts, it's called a judgment as a matter of law. There are rules that govern this process in both civil and criminal cases.

A more thorough explanation:

A motion for directed verdict is a request made by either the plaintiff or defendant before a case is submitted to the jury. It argues that no reasonable jury could find for the opposing party.

In federal civil law, these motions are governed by Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In federal criminal law, they are governed by Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

In the federal court system, directed verdicts have been largely replaced by judgment as a matter of law (JMOL).

In a personal injury case, the defendant's lawyer may make a motion for directed verdict if they believe that the plaintiff has not presented enough evidence to prove their case. The lawyer would argue that no reasonable jury could find the defendant liable based on the evidence presented.

This example illustrates how a motion for directed verdict is used to argue that there is not enough evidence to support a verdict in favor of the opposing party.

Motion | Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:46
do u have a dream school?
18:46
well i saw one is at fordham and one is at upenn and ik fordham isnt t14 but its better than temple and villanova
18:47
dream is duke
18:47
ooh interesting choice why Duke?
18:48
i got into fordham and so did the dumbass I was dating for like two months it’s not that hard
18:48
by which I mean if they let him in I don’t trust their standards
18:49
my dad went to duke law so i have been a fan forever
18:49
Duke is fun. I took a trip there when I was 19 or so. Really good time when I was a young rapscallion.
18:49
and ik i just dont think i gave myself enough time for a guaranteed 170+ performance
18:49
I didnt see if anyone answered my UGA question. Did anyone answer it?
18:53
@Dkkm11: are you not still a young rapscallion?
19:00
Nah, I am gray-bearded wizard.
19:02
Hmmm. I guess that’s okay.
19:03
Honestly, idk what I would call myself these days. Will probably not know until I can reflect on this part of my life which will be idk, in like 5 years when I am 32.
19:06
Does your life come in 5 year epochs typically?
19:06
Someone told me a while ago that I was probably molested as a kid because I don’t really have any clear memories of my childhood. But I don’t think I was.
1a2b3c4d26z
19:10
Inside thoughts!
19:10
this is where I post my inside thoughts
19:11
Nah, the fucked up thing about therapists is they try and make you think your parents are your enemy 99% of the time and really they should be telling you that your parents have almost no effect on the rest of your life. If they can get you to keep focusing on your parents they can keep making money.
19:12
Yeah, my life really does flow in about 5 years periods.
19:12
My crypto also flows in 5 day epochs too.
19:16
what do you do with your days as an unemployed crypto guy? do you play an instrument or something
19:47
please lawd
19:47
forgive me
19:47
its time to go back to tha old me
19:50
this is what i feel like when i get one single drill question right
19:50
when u get one wrong ;(
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.