Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges

Read a random definition: autonomous tariff

A quick definition of National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges:

The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges is a group of judges and hearing officers who handle cases involving family issues like abuse, neglect, divorce, custody, and domestic violence. They were founded in 1937 and have a place in Nevada where they help judges improve how they run their courtrooms. They provide training and support to make sure that family cases are handled fairly and properly.

A more thorough explanation:

The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges is an organization made up of judges and hearing officers who have the authority to make decisions in cases related to family law. These cases can include issues such as abuse, neglect, divorce, custody and visitation, support, and domestic violence.

The Council was founded in 1937 and is located near Reno, Nevada. Its main purpose is to provide training, technical support, and professional assistance to improve the way family law cases are handled in courtrooms.

For example, if a child is being abused by a parent, a judge who is a member of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges may be responsible for making decisions about the child's safety and well-being. The judge may also be involved in deciding which parent should have custody of the child.

Another example could be a divorce case where the judge who is a member of the Council may be responsible for deciding how property should be divided between the two parties and who should be responsible for paying child support.

National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws | National Credit Union Administration

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.