Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

new matter

Read a random definition: common jury

A quick definition of new matter:

New matter refers to new information or arguments presented in a legal case or patent application. In a legal case, it means presenting new issues beyond just denying the allegations. Parties can amend their pleadings to include new matter, but it becomes more difficult as the case approaches trial. In patent prosecution, new matter is additional information added to a patent. Patent holders can amend their patents, potentially adding new matter, but applicants cannot introduce new matter during reexamination of their application.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: New matter refers to additional information or arguments presented in a legal pleading or patent application that go beyond just denying the allegations or claims made.

Example 1: In a legal case, if a party wants to introduce new facts or arguments that were not included in their original pleading, they must seek permission from the court to amend their pleading. This is governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 15. However, as the case approaches trial, it becomes more difficult to amend the pleadings.

Example 2: In the context of patent prosecution, new matter refers to additional information added to a patent application. Patent holders can amend their patents under 35 U.S.C. §§ 251-256, potentially adding new matter. However, if an applicant's patent is rejected and they seek reexamination of their application, they are prohibited from introducing new matter under 35 U.S.C. § 132.

These examples illustrate how new matter can be introduced in legal proceedings or patent applications, but there are rules and limitations on when and how it can be done.

New Jersey | New Mexico

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.