Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

New York Times rule

Read a random definition: business license

A quick definition of New York Times rule:

The New York Times rule is a simple ethical guideline that suggests one should not do anything that could be considered newsworthy, whether in public or private, that they would not want to see reported on the front page of a major newspaper. This rule is also known as the New York Times test or the New York Times v. Sullivan rule. Malice is the intent to commit a wrongful act, and actual malice refers to the deliberate intent to cause harm or injury, as evidenced by external circumstances. To prevail in a defamation case, a plaintiff who is a public official or public figure must prove actual malice on the part of the defendant. Other types of claims may also require proof of actual malice to recover damages.

A more thorough explanation:

The New York Times rule is a common sense ethical guideline that suggests one should not do anything that could be considered newsworthy, whether in public or private, that they would not want to see reported on the front page of a major newspaper. This rule is also known as the New York Times test or the New York Times v. Sullivan rule.

For example, if a politician is caught engaging in illegal activity, they would not want to see this reported on the front page of a major newspaper. Therefore, they should avoid engaging in any activity that could be considered illegal or unethical.

The New York Times rule is based on the concept of malice, which refers to the intent to commit a wrongful act without justification or excuse. Malice can also refer to reckless disregard for the law or a person's legal rights, or ill will and wickedness of heart.

Actual malice is a legal term that refers to the deliberate intent to commit an injury, as evidenced by external circumstances. In the case of defamation, actual malice refers to knowledge that a statement is false or reckless disregard for whether the statement is true.

To avoid violating the New York Times rule, individuals should consider the potential consequences of their actions and avoid engaging in any activity that could be considered newsworthy in a negative way.

New York Times malice | nexi

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
GreyCeaselessMammoth
15:53
called it
15:53
i have two old classmates going to columbia for like social work
15:53
@lilypadfrog: that depends. flash ur mod badge to find out
soyalmondoatmilk
15:54
penn R too bruh
GreyCeaselessMammoth
15:55
luigi arc ended :(
15:56
you can be driven insane by chronic back pain anywhere :)
[M] lilypadfrog
15:57
@llama: if you insist
Trismegistus
15:57
STILL NOTHING?
Trismegistus
15:57
for me
RightPlant
15:57
anything from nyu?
Trismegistus
15:57
penn r people was it in portal under status or?
GreyCeaselessMammoth
15:58
i just got an email
15:58
guysss like my status :P
15:59
where is evol bunny
Trismegistus
15:59
wbu eggan where was yours email or status checker
15:59
thanks everyone i feel swagalicious now
15:59
email
Trismegistus
15:59
ah
Trismegistus
15:59
sorry guys :/
16:00
[deleted by lilypadfrog]
16:00
Reach out if you feel like you need to vent
16:00
brutha
16:00
Shit
16:00
Sorry
16:00
Thank you Lilypad
16:00
its ok at least dk or evil bunny didnt see
16:00
whoopsie teehee
starfishies
16:01
whenever my stat twin takes a hit i feel it too
lilypadfrog
16:01
be careful you guys!! I’m not always here
16:01
thanks starfishies
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.