Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

no fault

Read a random definition: natural object

A quick definition of no fault:

No fault: When something goes wrong, sometimes people have to go to court to figure out who is to blame. But in a "no fault" situation, nobody has to prove who did something wrong. This can happen in things like divorce or car accidents, where everyone involved gets help no matter who caused the problem.

A more thorough explanation:

No fault is a legal term that means a claim or case is resolved without determining who is at fault. In a no-fault claim, the parties involved do not have to prove that anyone is to blame for the situation. This is different from a fault-based claim, where the parties must prove that someone was at fault to win the case.

  • No-fault divorce: A type of divorce where the parties do not have to prove that one person was at fault for the marriage ending. Instead, they can show that the marriage has irretrievably broken down or that they have irreconcilable differences.
  • No-fault insurance: A type of insurance where the insurance company pays for losses regardless of who caused them. This is often used in auto insurance, where each driver's insurance company pays for their own damages, regardless of who caused the accident.

These examples illustrate how no fault works in different legal situations. In a no-fault divorce, the parties do not have to prove that one person caused the marriage to end. Instead, they can show that the marriage is irretrievably broken down or that they have irreconcilable differences. In no-fault insurance, the insurance company pays for damages regardless of who caused the accident. This can make it easier and faster to resolve claims, as there is no need to determine who was at fault.

no contest | No Further Inquiry Rule

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.