Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

non vult contendere

Read a random definition: venery

A quick definition of non vult contendere:

Term: NON VULT CONTENDERE

Definition: Non vult contendere means "he will not contest it" in Latin. It is a legal term that is commonly used to indicate a plea of no contest. This means that the defendant does not admit guilt but also does not dispute the charges against them. In simpler terms, it is like saying "I'm not saying I did it, but I'm not going to fight it either."

Example: John was charged with speeding, but he decided to plead non vult contendere instead of guilty or not guilty.

A more thorough explanation:

NON VULT CONTENDERE

Non vult contendere is a Latin term that means "he will not contest it". In legal terms, it is used to indicate a plea in which the defendant does not admit guilt but also does not contest the charges against them. This is also known as a "no contest" plea.

Example 1: John was charged with a traffic violation but decided to plead non vult contendere instead of fighting the charges in court.

Example 2: The defendant entered a plea of non vult contendere to the charges of embezzlement.

These examples illustrate how non vult contendere is used in legal proceedings. In both cases, the defendant did not admit guilt but also did not contest the charges against them. This plea is often used when the defendant wants to avoid a trial or when they believe that fighting the charges would be difficult.

nonvoting stock | nonwaiver agreement

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.