Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

nonart rejection

Read a random definition: writ of consultation

A quick definition of nonart rejection:

Nonart rejection is when someone refuses to accept an offer or goods that do not meet the agreed-upon standards. This can happen in contracts or when someone tries to patent an invention that is too similar to something that already exists. There are many different types of nonart rejection, including formal rejection, lack-of-enablement rejection, and undue-breadth rejection. It's important to make sure that everything meets the necessary requirements before trying to sell or patent something.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Nonart rejection is a refusal to accept a contractual offer or tendered goods as contractual performance. It can also refer to a patent examiner's finding that a claim in a patent application is unpatentable.

Examples:

  • When a buyer receives goods that do not meet the agreed-upon specifications, they can reject the goods and ask for a refund or replacement. This is an example of nonart rejection in a contractual context.
  • A patent examiner may reject a patent application if they find that the invention is not new or non-obvious, or if the application does not provide enough information to enable someone skilled in the relevant field to make and use the invention. These are examples of nonart rejection in a patent context.

These examples illustrate how nonart rejection can occur in different contexts, but the underlying principle is the same: a party is refusing to accept something because it does not meet their expectations or legal requirements.

nonapportionment rule | nonassertion letter

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:44
My berkeley paragraph finally disappeared. I definitely think it is just an indicator that they are actively reviewing files, and does not mean anything about A, WL, or Rs
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:46
Also has anyone's date disappeared for W&L? Mine did last night
7:55
@WorthlessAttractiveZombie: mine did yesterday morning
7:56
Oops sorry I meant Vilanova. Mine disappeared last week
soapy
8:48
UMN under review! As predicted, decisions are gonna come out early December
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.