Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

objective but-for test

Read a random definition: writ of replevin

A quick definition of objective but-for test:

An objective but-for test is a way to determine if information that was not disclosed during a patent application process would have made a difference in whether or not the patent would have been granted. This test looks at whether the patent would have been granted if the information had been disclosed, rather than whether the examiner was influenced by the information. The Federal Circuit has rejected this test in favor of a different test codified in 37 CFR § 1.56.

A more thorough explanation:

The objective but-for test is a method used in patent law to determine the materiality of withheld information. It is used to assess whether the withheld information, if disclosed, would have resulted in a finding of unpatentability.

For example, if an applicant for a patent withholds information that is crucial to the patent's validity, the objective but-for test would determine whether the patent would have been granted if that information had been disclosed.

It is important to note that there is also a subjective but-for test, which focuses on whether the misrepresentation caused the examiner to issue the patent. However, the Federal Circuit has rejected this test in favor of the materiality test codified in 37 CFR § 1.56.

Overall, the objective but-for test is a way to determine whether a patent was granted based on incomplete or misleading information, and whether it would have been granted if all relevant information had been disclosed.

objective | objective entrapment

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:46
do u have a dream school?
18:46
well i saw one is at fordham and one is at upenn and ik fordham isnt t14 but its better than temple and villanova
18:47
dream is duke
18:47
ooh interesting choice why Duke?
18:48
i got into fordham and so did the dumbass I was dating for like two months it’s not that hard
18:48
by which I mean if they let him in I don’t trust their standards
18:49
my dad went to duke law so i have been a fan forever
18:49
Duke is fun. I took a trip there when I was 19 or so. Really good time when I was a young rapscallion.
18:49
and ik i just dont think i gave myself enough time for a guaranteed 170+ performance
18:49
I didnt see if anyone answered my UGA question. Did anyone answer it?
18:53
@Dkkm11: are you not still a young rapscallion?
19:00
Nah, I am gray-bearded wizard.
19:02
Hmmm. I guess that’s okay.
19:03
Honestly, idk what I would call myself these days. Will probably not know until I can reflect on this part of my life which will be idk, in like 5 years when I am 32.
19:06
Does your life come in 5 year epochs typically?
19:06
Someone told me a while ago that I was probably molested as a kid because I don’t really have any clear memories of my childhood. But I don’t think I was.
1a2b3c4d26z
19:10
Inside thoughts!
19:10
this is where I post my inside thoughts
19:11
Nah, the fucked up thing about therapists is they try and make you think your parents are your enemy 99% of the time and really they should be telling you that your parents have almost no effect on the rest of your life. If they can get you to keep focusing on your parents they can keep making money.
19:12
Yeah, my life really does flow in about 5 years periods.
19:12
My crypto also flows in 5 day epochs too.
19:16
what do you do with your days as an unemployed crypto guy? do you play an instrument or something
19:47
please lawd
19:47
forgive me
19:47
its time to go back to tha old me
19:50
this is what i feel like when i get one single drill question right
19:50
when u get one wrong ;(
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.