Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

objective but-for test

Read a random definition: account duty

A quick definition of objective but-for test:

An objective but-for test is a way to determine if information that was not disclosed during a patent application process would have made a difference in whether or not the patent would have been granted. This test looks at whether the patent would have been granted if the information had been disclosed, rather than whether the examiner was influenced by the information. The Federal Circuit has rejected this test in favor of a different test codified in 37 CFR § 1.56.

A more thorough explanation:

The objective but-for test is a method used in patent law to determine the materiality of withheld information. It is used to assess whether the withheld information, if disclosed, would have resulted in a finding of unpatentability.

For example, if an applicant for a patent withholds information that is crucial to the patent's validity, the objective but-for test would determine whether the patent would have been granted if that information had been disclosed.

It is important to note that there is also a subjective but-for test, which focuses on whether the misrepresentation caused the examiner to issue the patent. However, the Federal Circuit has rejected this test in favor of the materiality test codified in 37 CFR § 1.56.

Overall, the objective but-for test is a way to determine whether a patent was granted based on incomplete or misleading information, and whether it would have been granted if all relevant information had been disclosed.

objective | objective entrapment

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.