Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

obviousness double patenting

Read a random definition: interference-estoppel rejection

A quick definition of obviousness double patenting:

Obviousness double patenting is when someone tries to get a patent for an invention that is too similar to another invention they already have a patent for. This is not allowed because you can't have more than one patent for the same thing. It's like trying to get two stickers for the same picture. There are two types of double patenting: same-invention double patenting, which is when the inventions are exactly the same, and obviousness-type double patenting, which is when the inventions are very similar but have some small differences that can't be patented. If someone tries to get a double patent, their application can be rejected or their patent can be invalidated.

A more thorough explanation:

Obviousness double patenting is when an inventor tries to patent an invention that is too similar to another invention they have already patented or have a pending patent application for. This can happen in two ways:

  1. Statutory double patenting: This is when an inventor tries to patent the same invention twice. This is not allowed, and any double patenting can result in the invalidation of the patent claim or rejection of the patent application.
  2. Judicially created double patenting: This is when an inventor tries to patent an invention that is an obvious variation of another invention they have already patented or have a pending patent application for. This is also not allowed, and can result in the rejection of the patent application, limiting the term of the patent through a terminal disclaimer, or invalidating the patent.

For example, if an inventor has already patented a new type of phone case that is made of silicone, they cannot then try to patent a phone case that is made of rubber, as this is too similar and would be considered obviousness double patenting.

obviousness | obviousness-type double patenting

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.