Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

obviousness-type double patenting

Read a random definition: listed security

A quick definition of obviousness-type double patenting:

Double patenting is when someone tries to get two patents for the same invention or for an invention that is too similar to one that has already been patented. This is not allowed because it is unfair to have more than one patent for the same thing. There are two types of double patenting: same-invention double patenting and obviousness-type double patenting. Same-invention double patenting is when someone tries to patent the exact same thing as another inventor. Obviousness-type double patenting is when someone tries to patent an invention that is only slightly different from another invention that has already been patented. Double patenting can lead to a patent being rejected or invalidated.

A more thorough explanation:

Obviousness-type double patenting is a situation where an inventor tries to obtain a patent for an invention that is only a minor variation of another invention they have already patented or have a pending patent application for. This type of double patenting is not allowed because it is considered unfair to grant multiple patents for the same invention or a minor variation of it.

For example, if an inventor has already obtained a patent for a new type of smartphone, they cannot obtain another patent for a slightly modified version of the same smartphone. This is because the modification is not significant enough to warrant a new patent.

Another example is if an inventor has a patent for a new type of car engine, they cannot obtain another patent for a slightly modified version of the same engine. This is because the modification is not significant enough to warrant a new patent.

Overall, obviousness-type double patenting is not allowed because it goes against the principle of fairness and discourages innovation by allowing inventors to monopolize an invention or a minor variation of it.

obviousness double patenting | obviousness-type double-patenting rejection

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:05
dodged the mich r wave what does this mean
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.