Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

official-capacity suit

Read a random definition: Decretum Gratiani

A quick definition of official-capacity suit:

An official-capacity suit is a type of lawsuit where the defendant is a state or local government, but the lawsuit is nominally against one or more individual state employees. The real party in interest is the government entity. This is different from a personal-capacity suit, which seeks to impose personal, individual liability on a government officer. Other types of lawsuits include class actions, derivative suits, and frivolous suits.

A more thorough explanation:

An official-capacity suit is a type of lawsuit that is filed against one or more individual state employees, but the real party in interest is the state or a local government. This means that the lawsuit is actually against the government, but it is brought against individual employees who are acting on behalf of the government.

For example, if a person wants to sue a state government for violating their civil rights, they may file an official-capacity suit against a state employee who was involved in the violation. However, the lawsuit is actually against the state government, and any damages awarded would be paid by the government.

Official-capacity suits are different from personal-capacity suits, which are actions to impose personal, individual liability on a government officer.

One example of an official-capacity suit is a lawsuit filed against a police officer for using excessive force during an arrest. The lawsuit may name the officer as a defendant, but the real party in interest is the police department or the city government.

Another example is a lawsuit filed against a state agency for failing to provide adequate services to people with disabilities. The lawsuit may name individual employees of the agency as defendants, but the real party in interest is the state government.

officer's report | official corruption

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.