Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

own-product exclusion

Read a random definition: legem amittere

A quick definition of own-product exclusion:

An own-product exclusion is a rule in some insurance policies that says the insurance company won't pay for damage to a product that the insured person made, sold, or handled. For example, if a company makes a toy that breaks and hurts someone, the insurance company might not cover the costs of the injury because of the own-product exclusion.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: An insurance-policy provision that excludes coverage for property damage to a product that is manufactured, sold, handled, distributed, or disposed of by the insured.

Example: A company that produces and sells electronic devices has an insurance policy that includes an own-product exclusion clause. If one of their devices malfunctions and causes property damage, the insurance company will not cover the costs of the damage because it was caused by the company's own product.

This example illustrates how the own-product exclusion clause works in an insurance policy. It means that the insurance company will not provide coverage for any property damage caused by the insured's own product. This clause is commonly found in commercial general liability policies and is intended to protect the insurance company from having to pay for damages caused by the insured's own products.

owner's policy | own-work exclusion

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.