Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

paction

Read a random definition: metus perjurii

A quick definition of paction:

Term: PACTION

Definition: Paction means an agreement between two countries that can be completed by a single action. It is a term used in international law.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Paction (pak-shən) is a legal term that refers to an agreement between two nations that is to be carried out through a single act.

Example 1: The two countries signed a paction to establish a joint military base in the region.

Example 2: The paction between the two nations allowed for the extradition of criminals between their respective countries.

These examples illustrate how a paction is a specific type of agreement between two nations that is designed to be carried out through a single act. In the first example, the establishment of a joint military base is a complex undertaking that requires a lot of planning and coordination. However, the paction simplifies the process by allowing the two nations to agree on the terms of the base in advance and then carry out the construction and staffing of the base through a single act. In the second example, the paction allows for the extradition of criminals between the two nations. This is a complex legal process that involves many different steps, but the paction simplifies the process by allowing the two nations to agree on the terms of the extradition in advance and then carry out the transfer of the criminal through a single act.

pactio | pactional

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.