11:18
@ClockworkBlue: I feel like most people could train for the 40 for the same amount of time as they do the LSAT and get close to sub 5 which would be equivalent to a 167+
Warning
Info
Warning
Info
LSDefine
Simple English definitions for legal terms
Parker doctrine
Read a random definition: Miller–Tydings Act
A quick definition of Parker doctrine:
The Parker doctrine is a legal principle that says antitrust laws do not apply to actions taken by a state or its officials. This means that a state can engage in anticompetitive behavior without violating antitrust laws. The doctrine was established in the case of Parker v. Brown in 1943. It is also known as the state-action doctrine. However, there are some limitations to this doctrine, which are evaluated using the Midcal test.
A more thorough explanation:
The Parker Doctrine, also known as the State-Action Doctrine, is a principle in antitrust law that states that the antitrust laws do not apply to a state's anticompetitive acts or official acts directed by a state.
For example, if a state government creates a law that limits competition in a certain industry, that law would not be subject to antitrust scrutiny under the Parker Doctrine. This is because the state is considered to be acting in its sovereign capacity and is therefore exempt from antitrust laws.
The Parker Doctrine was established in the landmark case of Parker v. Brown in 1943. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Sherman Antitrust Act did not apply to a California law that regulated the price of raisins produced in the state.
Overall, the Parker Doctrine provides an important exception to antitrust laws, allowing states to regulate certain industries without fear of antitrust liability.