Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

parole revocation

Read a random definition: privileged communication

A quick definition of parole revocation:

Parole revocation is when someone who was released from prison early on parole is sent back to prison because they did not follow the rules of their parole. This can happen if they commit another crime or violate any of the conditions of their parole.

A more thorough explanation:

PAROLE REVOCATION

Parole revocation is when a person who has been released from prison on parole is sent back to prison because they did not follow the rules of their parole. This can happen if they commit a new crime or violate any of the conditions of their parole.

Example 1: John was released from prison on parole after serving time for theft. One of the conditions of his parole was that he had to attend regular meetings with his parole officer. However, John missed several of these meetings and did not have a good reason for it. As a result, his parole was revoked and he was sent back to prison.

Example 2: Sarah was released from prison on parole after serving time for drug possession. One of the conditions of her parole was that she could not use drugs or alcohol. However, Sarah was caught using drugs and her parole was revoked. She was sent back to prison to serve the rest of her sentence.

These examples illustrate how parole revocation works. When a person is released on parole, they are given certain conditions that they must follow. If they fail to follow these conditions, their parole can be revoked and they can be sent back to prison. This is done to ensure that they are held accountable for their actions and to protect society from any potential harm they may cause.

parole board | parol lease

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.