Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

part-performance doctrine

Read a random definition: family meeting

A quick definition of part-performance doctrine:

The part-performance doctrine is a rule that allows a party to enforce an oral contract, even if it violates the statute of frauds, if the party has already performed part of the contract in reliance on the other party's oral promise. This means that if one party has already done something in the agreement, like taking possession of property or making improvements, a court may enforce the contract even if it was not in writing. This rule was established by English courts of equity and is based on the idea that it would be unfair to allow one party to back out of an agreement after the other party has already relied on their promise.

A more thorough explanation:

The part-performance doctrine is an equitable principle that allows a party to enforce an oral contract that would otherwise be unenforceable under the statute of frauds. This doctrine applies when one party has partially performed their obligations under the oral contract in reliance on the other party's oral promise.

For example, if John orally agrees to sell his car to Jane for $5,000, but they do not put the agreement in writing, the contract is unenforceable under the statute of frauds. However, if Jane pays John $2,500 and takes possession of the car, the part-performance doctrine may apply. Jane has partially performed her obligations under the oral contract by paying John and taking possession of the car, and she did so in reliance on John's oral promise to sell her the car. Therefore, a court may enforce the oral contract despite the lack of a written agreement.

The part-performance doctrine is an exception to the statute of frauds and is based on the principle of equity. It allows a court to enforce an oral contract when it would be unfair to allow one party to back out of the agreement after the other party has partially performed their obligations.

part performance | part-sovereign state

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.