Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Patent Act

Read a random definition: state secret

A quick definition of Patent Act:

The Patent Act is a law that was created in 1952 to govern how patents are registered and protected. It changed some of the rules for getting a patent, making it easier for people to get patents for new combinations of things and allowing certain types of claims to be valid again. The law also made it harder for people to be accused of infringing on someone else's patent.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The Patent Act is a federal law that governs the registration and protection of patents in the United States. It was enacted in 1952 and is currently in effect. The Act outlines the requirements for obtaining a patent and the rights that come with it.

The Patent Act of 1952 made several changes to the previous laws regarding patents. It eliminated the requirement for a "flash of genius" in combination patents, which means that an invention does not have to be a groundbreaking discovery to be eligible for a patent. It also made "means-plus-function" claims valid again, which allows inventors to describe their invention in terms of its function rather than its structure. Additionally, the Act narrowed the doctrine of contributory infringement, which means that it is more difficult to be found guilty of infringing on someone else's patent.

Example: An inventor creates a new type of smartphone case that has a built-in battery pack. They apply for a patent under the Patent Act and are granted one. This means that they have the exclusive right to manufacture, sell, and use their invention for a certain period of time. If someone else tries to make or sell a similar smartphone case without the inventor's permission, they could be sued for patent infringement.

Explanation: This example illustrates how the Patent Act protects inventors by giving them exclusive rights to their inventions. Without this law, anyone could copy an invention and sell it without the inventor's permission, which would discourage innovation and creativity. The Patent Act encourages inventors to share their ideas with the world by giving them legal protection and the ability to profit from their inventions.

patentable subject matter | Patent Act of 1790

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.