Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Patent Act of 1793

Read a random definition: Florida Case-Law

A quick definition of Patent Act of 1793:

The Patent Act of 1793 was a law in the United States that made it easy for people to register their inventions and get a patent. This law also said that if someone copied your invention without permission, you could go to court and prove that your invention was new and not something that was already known to the public. The law also said that there were four types of things that could be patented: machines, things that were made, mixtures of different things, and processes (which means a way of doing something). The government was in charge of registering patents, but it was up to the courts to decide if they were valid or not.

A more thorough explanation:

The Patent Act of 1793 was a law in the United States that made it easier for people to register their inventions and get patents. Instead of having to go through a long examination process, inventors could simply register their invention with the State Department. The law also established rules for what could be patented and what defenses could be used against patent infringement.

Under the Patent Act of 1793, there were four categories of patentable subject matter: machines, manufactures, compositions of matter, and arts (now called processes). This meant that if an invention fell into one of these categories, it could be patented.

The law also established two defenses against patent infringement: lack of novelty and public use. If someone could prove that an invention was not new or had already been used by the public, they could not be sued for infringing on a patent.

For example, if someone invented a new machine that could make shoes faster than any other machine, they could register their invention and get a patent under the Patent Act of 1793. If someone else tried to make the same machine without permission, the inventor could sue them for patent infringement. However, if the person being sued could prove that the machine was not new or had already been used by the public, they would not be found guilty of patent infringement.

Patent Act of 1790 | Patent Act of 1836

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.