Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

pro–con debate

Read a random definition: submit

A quick definition of pro–con debate:

A pro-con debate is a formal discussion where people take turns giving speeches for or against a motion. The goal is to consider the merits of the motion and come to a decision. The debate can be controlled by a leader who manages the time for each side, or it can be extended beyond a set time limit. Sometimes, there are restrictions on the debate, and speeches must alternate between opposing viewpoints.

A more thorough explanation:

A pro-con debate is a type of debate where speakers take turns presenting arguments for or against a motion or proposition. The goal is to persuade the audience or the opposing side to agree with their point of view.

For example, in a pro-con debate about whether or not to legalize marijuana, one speaker might argue that it should be legalized because it has medical benefits and could generate tax revenue. Another speaker might argue against legalization, citing concerns about addiction and negative effects on public health.

The alternating speeches in a pro-con debate help ensure that both sides are heard and that the audience can make an informed decision. However, sometimes one side may have more speakers than the other, in which case the chair may allow multiple speeches in a row from the same side.

proclamator | pro–con divorce

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lilypadfrog
20:07
your good personal friend Sam Hyde
YouTube is recommending sam hyde to me thanks to dk
Dkk
20:07
Lmfao, that would be cool but nah. Told me about him in a super secret leaked video called "Dear Elon"
lilypadfrog
20:08
I almost saw a picture of Nick Mullen’s penis once
Dkk
20:09
Classic Season 1/2 cumtown leak.
lilypadfrog
20:09
He sent it to my friend
Well I look like a bum, use to my work computer not allowing us to send emails without a subject and sent one without a subject to UTK. Blame the newborn baby brain
20:10
@BulbasaurNoLikeCardio: wow you are really impressive applying to law school as a newborn baby
20:10
.
Dkk
20:11
@lilypadfrog: Speaking of Destiny and Nick. Still seems like Nick is leaking graphic content: https://x.com/brandonpagano/status/1881468884798365804
lilypadfrog
20:11
I read that as you sent them a pic of the baby for a second
kjds are getting crazier
texaslawhopefully
20:11
Sorry to interrupt this scintillating conversation but uchicago needs to release tmrw 😭
20:11
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
20:12
sorry
are we not going to get context on nick mullen sending nudes to your friend
lilypadfrog
20:13
he was sexting anyone back in the day and she’s cute
awww
New born baby brain is what you get when you can only sleep in small increments for days straight lol and if I sent them a picture of her I would of gotten a second A so she can attend full ride
Dkk
20:18
@lilypadfrog: lol desperate guy
Trismegistus
20:18
tex i need an A tomorrow from chicago
texaslawhopefully
20:18
Me and you both
texaslawhopefully
20:19
If I get an A from Chicago, I feel like my cycle will have turned out pretty great for my goals
texaslawhopefully
20:19
If I don’t, well…I’ll be back here next year rip
Wouldn't go to Cornell? Also, what's the competitiveness expectation for next cycle?
Trismegistus
20:22
i will be happier than a pig in shit man
texaslawhopefully
20:22
I want to clerk, and Cornell has a 5 percent clerk rate
texaslawhopefully
20:22
Fed clerk
texaslawhopefully
20:23
Chicago is at 25 percent. It’s just such a massive difference I don’t think it’s worth it to go elsewhere besides HYSC and maybe UVA
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.