Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

proof, burden of

Read a random definition: haeretico comburendo

A quick definition of proof, burden of:

The burden of proof is the responsibility of a party to prove a disputed assertion or charge. This includes both the burden of persuasion and the burden of production. The burden of persuasion is the obligation to convince the judge or jury that the assertion is true, while the burden of production is the duty to introduce evidence to support the assertion. The burden of proof can also refer to the risk of non-persuasion, meaning the party with this burden stands to lose if their evidence fails to convince the judge or jury. There is also a middle burden of proof, which requires a party to prove a fact by clear and convincing evidence, which is a higher standard than preponderance of the evidence but lower than beyond a reasonable doubt.

A more thorough explanation:

The burden of proof refers to a party's responsibility to prove a disputed assertion or charge. This includes both the burden of persuasion (convincing the judge or jury) and the burden of production (presenting evidence to support the assertion).

For example, in a criminal trial, the prosecution has the burden of proving the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil lawsuit, the plaintiff has the burden of proving their case by a preponderance of the evidence (meaning it is more likely than not that their version of events is true).

There is also a middle burden of proof, where a party must prove a fact by clear and convincing evidence. This standard is higher than preponderance of the evidence but lower than beyond a reasonable doubt.

Overall, the burden of proof is an important concept in legal proceedings, as it determines which party has the responsibility to present evidence and convince the judge or jury of their position.

pro non scripto | proof brief

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
19:43
@Dkk: yeah register 1 website and every swinging tom dick and harry calls/emails/texts to 'help with seo'. like bruh, if YOU found it, what i am doing is working
Dkk
19:43
Indeed!
19:48
wasp, i think people are hopeful for a gov who at least attempts to care about the common man
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.