Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

proviso

Read a random definition: zone

A quick definition of proviso:

A proviso is a rule in a legal agreement that says something must happen or not happen before the agreement can be valid. It's like a condition that needs to be met. If the proviso is not fulfilled, the whole agreement might not be valid. The word comes from Latin and means "provided that." Sometimes, a proviso can also be used in a philosophical or political context to set a condition for something to happen.

A more thorough explanation:

A proviso is a clause in a legal document, like a contract or a law, that requires something to happen or not happen before the rest of the document can be valid. The word comes from the Latin phrase "proviso quod," which means "provided that."

For example, let's say you sign a contract to buy a car, but there's a proviso that says the sale is only valid if you get financing from a specific bank. If you can't get financing from that bank, the sale is not valid.

In a law, a proviso might create an exception to a rule. For instance, the Wilmot Proviso was a failed attempt by Congress to ban slavery in new territories acquired after the Mexican-American War. The proviso stated that slavery could not exist in those territories, except for punishment for a crime.

Another example of a proviso is the Lockean proviso, which is a condition to John Locke's theory of property. It says that people have a right to property they create from natural resources, but only if there is enough left for others to use as well.

These examples show how a proviso can be an important part of a legal document, creating conditions that must be met before the rest of the document can be valid.

provisional remedy | provocation

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.