LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quae non mente sed manu tenentur

Read a random definition: adequacy test

A quick definition of quae non mente sed manu tenentur:

Term: QUAE NON MENTE SED MANU TENENTUR

Definition: This is a Latin phrase that means "things that are held not by the mind but by hand." It refers to the natural duties that parents have towards their children because they love them, not just because it is required by law.

A more thorough explanation:

QUAE NON MENTE SED MANU TENENTUR

Quae non mente sed manu tenentur is a Latin legal term that means "things that are held not by the mind but by hand." It refers to the natural parental duties that arise from affection for one's child, as distinguished from purely legal obligations.

Examples of quae non mente sed manu tenentur include:

Feeding and clothing a child
Providing a safe and nurturing home environment
Teaching a child right from wrong
Offering emotional support and guidance

These examples illustrate the idea that there are certain responsibilities that parents have towards their children that are not just legal obligations, but are also driven by love and affection. These duties are held not just in the mind, but are carried out through physical actions and care.

quae functionem recipiunt | quae non recipiunt functionem

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

texaslawhopefully

20:32

I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc

ImpartialLion

20:32

It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)

texaslawhopefully

20:34

Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf

texaslawhopefully

20:35

Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference

lilypadfrog

20:36

I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex

windyMagician

20:37

yeah I've heard about uva being conservative

siroracle

20:48

Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying

Dkk

20:53

lmfao

llama

20:59

@siroracle: funny cause true

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

20:59

@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:00

shouldn't you be collecting tolls

llama

21:00

trolololol

atwatodbit

21:04

anyone know much about mich clerking

atwatodbit

21:05

ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?

llama

21:05

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jTv6iNl9_kfTVbDdIw4ml-CeKWOkeWtArYhhuj1-8U8/edit?usp=sharing 13.7

llama

21:06

this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools

atwatodbit

21:06

@llama: thanks!

llama

21:06

yah

Dkk

21:10

Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.

Dkk

21:10

https://x.com/TheManlet_King/status/1882180191851774268

llama

21:14

sad

YRDSL

21:31

@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State

texaslawhopefully

21:40

lmfao I didn't even notice that

llama

21:42

Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a

llama

21:42

Those are fighting words

info-man

21:46

@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading

lilypadfrog

22:03

sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done

CurvyHypnoticSheepdog

22:13

i call that locking in

Dkk

22:29

@info-man: Indeed!

[] swagadocious

22:43

No movement today

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.