Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quae non mente sed manu tenentur

Read a random definition: calculated ambiguity

A quick definition of quae non mente sed manu tenentur:

Term: QUAE NON MENTE SED MANU TENENTUR

Definition: This is a Latin phrase that means "things that are held not by the mind but by hand." It refers to the natural duties that parents have towards their children because they love them, not just because it is required by law.

A more thorough explanation:

QUAE NON MENTE SED MANU TENENTUR

Quae non mente sed manu tenentur is a Latin legal term that means "things that are held not by the mind but by hand." It refers to the natural parental duties that arise from affection for one's child, as distinguished from purely legal obligations.

Examples of quae non mente sed manu tenentur include:

  • Feeding and clothing a child
  • Providing a safe and nurturing home environment
  • Teaching a child right from wrong
  • Offering emotional support and guidance

These examples illustrate the idea that there are certain responsibilities that parents have towards their children that are not just legal obligations, but are also driven by love and affection. These duties are held not just in the mind, but are carried out through physical actions and care.

quae functionem recipiunt | quae non recipiunt functionem

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.