Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quae non recipiunt functionem

Read a random definition: occupational crime

A quick definition of quae non recipiunt functionem:

Term: QUAE NON RECIPIUNT FUNCTIONEM

Definition: This is a Latin phrase used in law to describe things that cannot be replaced by anything else. It means "they that do not supply the place of others." This phrase is often used to refer to unique or specific goods that cannot be substituted with something else. It is the opposite of QUAE FUNCTIONEM RECIPIUNT, which means things that can be replaced.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Quae non recipiunt functionem (pronounced kwee non ri-sip-ee-uhnt fungk-shuh-nuhm) is a Latin legal term that refers to goods that are unique, specific, or irreplaceable and cannot be substituted by others.

Example: A painting by a famous artist, such as the Mona Lisa, is an example of quae non recipiunt functionem. There is only one original painting, and it cannot be replaced by a copy or a similar artwork.

Explanation: The term quae non recipiunt functionem is used in legal contexts to describe goods that have a special value or significance and cannot be easily replaced. These goods may include rare or antique items, one-of-a-kind artworks, or unique pieces of jewelry. The phrase emphasizes the importance of these goods and the fact that they cannot be substituted by others.

quae non mente sed manu tenentur | quae perimunt causam

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
23:12
Windy wya
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.