Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quaerens nihil capiat per billam

Read a random definition: reenactment rule

A quick definition of quaerens nihil capiat per billam:

Term: QUAERENS NIHIL CAPIAT PER BILLAM

Definition: Quaerens nihil capiat per billam is a Latin phrase used in law. It means that the plaintiff (the person who brings a case to court) should take nothing by his bill (the document that starts a legal case). This was a way for the court to rule in favor of the defendant (the person being sued).

A more thorough explanation:

QUAERENS NIHIL CAPIAT PER BILLAM

Quaerens nihil capiat per billam is a Latin legal term that means "let the plaintiff take nothing by his bill." It was a form of judgment for the defendant in historical legal cases.

For example, if a plaintiff filed a lawsuit against a defendant but failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim, the judge may have ruled in favor of the defendant and issued a judgment of quaerens nihil capiat per billam. This means that the plaintiff would not receive any compensation or damages from the defendant.

Another example could be if a plaintiff filed a lawsuit but failed to follow proper legal procedures or deadlines, the judge may have issued a judgment of quaerens nihil capiat per billam, meaning that the plaintiff's case would be dismissed.

The examples illustrate how the judgment of quaerens nihil capiat per billam was used in historical legal cases. It was a way for the judge to rule in favor of the defendant when the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence or follow proper legal procedures. This judgment prevented the plaintiff from receiving any compensation or damages from the defendant.

quaerens | quaerens non invenit plegium

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
19:43
@Dkk: yeah register 1 website and every swinging tom dick and harry calls/emails/texts to 'help with seo'. like bruh, if YOU found it, what i am doing is working
Dkk
19:43
Indeed!
19:48
wasp, i think people are hopeful for a gov who at least attempts to care about the common man
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.