Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quaerens nihil capiat per billam

Read a random definition: administrative expense

A quick definition of quaerens nihil capiat per billam:

Term: QUAERENS NIHIL CAPIAT PER BILLAM

Definition: Quaerens nihil capiat per billam is a Latin phrase used in law. It means that the plaintiff (the person who brings a case to court) should take nothing by his bill (the document that starts a legal case). This was a way for the court to rule in favor of the defendant (the person being sued).

A more thorough explanation:

QUAERENS NIHIL CAPIAT PER BILLAM

Quaerens nihil capiat per billam is a Latin legal term that means "let the plaintiff take nothing by his bill." It was a form of judgment for the defendant in historical legal cases.

For example, if a plaintiff filed a lawsuit against a defendant but failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim, the judge may have ruled in favor of the defendant and issued a judgment of quaerens nihil capiat per billam. This means that the plaintiff would not receive any compensation or damages from the defendant.

Another example could be if a plaintiff filed a lawsuit but failed to follow proper legal procedures or deadlines, the judge may have issued a judgment of quaerens nihil capiat per billam, meaning that the plaintiff's case would be dismissed.

The examples illustrate how the judgment of quaerens nihil capiat per billam was used in historical legal cases. It was a way for the judge to rule in favor of the defendant when the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence or follow proper legal procedures. This judgment prevented the plaintiff from receiving any compensation or damages from the defendant.

quaerens | quaerens non invenit plegium

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.