Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quod ei deforceat

Read a random definition: act-of-state doctrine

A quick definition of quod ei deforceat:

Term: quod ei deforceat

Definition: Quod ei deforceat is a legal term that means "that he deforces him". It refers to a writ that was allowed by St. Westm. 2, 13 Edw., ch. 4 for the owners of a particular estate who had lost land unwittingly by default in a possessory action. This writ was only available to owners in fee simple before this time.

A more thorough explanation:

quod ei deforceat

Quod ei deforceat is a legal term that means "that he deforces him." It was a writ that allowed owners of a specific type of estate, such as a life estate or fee tail, to recover land that they had lost unknowingly due to a possessory action. Before this writ was allowed, only owners in fee simple could recover their property after such a default.

An example of quod ei deforceat would be if someone had a life estate in a piece of land, but they lost it due to a legal action that they were not aware of. They could then use the quod ei deforceat writ to recover their land.

Another example would be if someone had a fee tail estate, but they lost their land due to a possessory action. They could then use the quod ei deforceat writ to recover their land.

These examples illustrate how the quod ei deforceat writ was used to help owners of specific types of estates recover their land after losing it due to legal actions they were not aware of.

quod cum | quod erat faciendum

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.