Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

reclamation

Read a random definition: head of household

A quick definition of reclamation:

Reclamation: Making useless land better by changing it, like watering a desert. It can also mean a seller taking back things they sold if the buyer can't pay. Lastly, it can mean getting valuable things from waste.

A more thorough explanation:

RECLAMATION

Reclamation is the process of improving the value of land that is not useful for economic purposes by physically changing it. This can include activities like irrigating a desert to make it suitable for farming.

Reclamation can also refer to a seller's limited right to retrieve goods delivered to a buyer when the buyer is insolvent. Additionally, it can refer to the act of obtaining valuable materials from waste materials.

  • Example 1: A company purchases a piece of land that was previously used for mining. The company invests in cleaning up the land and restoring it to its natural state, making it suitable for recreational activities like hiking and camping.
  • Example 2: A farmer in a dry region invests in irrigation systems to make the land suitable for growing crops.
  • Example 3: A manufacturer recycles waste materials to obtain valuable resources like metals and plastics.

These examples illustrate how reclamation involves physically changing land or materials to make them useful and valuable. In the first example, the land is restored to a state where it can be used for recreational purposes. In the second example, the land is made suitable for farming through the use of irrigation. In the third example, waste materials are transformed into valuable resources through recycling.

recklessness | reclusion

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.