Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

requirement for division

Read a random definition: most suitable use

A quick definition of requirement for division:

Requirement for division: A rule that applies to patent applications where the examiner determines that there are multiple distinct inventions in the application. The applicant must choose one invention to continue pursuing and may either abandon the other inventions or file separate applications for them. This rule is also known as a requirement for restriction or simply restriction.

A more thorough explanation:

A requirement for division is a term used in patent law. It refers to a patent examiner's ruling that a patent application contains two or more distinct inventions. The applicant must then choose one invention to continue prosecuting under the original application by abandoning some of the original claims.

For example, if an inventor applies for a patent on a new type of car engine that also includes a unique transmission system, the patent examiner may require the inventor to choose which invention to pursue. The inventor can either abandon the transmission system and focus on the engine or file a separate application for the transmission system.

This requirement is important because it ensures that each patent covers only one invention, making it easier for others to understand and avoid infringing on the patent. It also helps prevent inventors from monopolizing too many ideas with a single patent.

required reserve | requirement for restriction

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.