Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

requirement for restriction

Read a random definition: vitricus

A quick definition of requirement for restriction:

A requirement for restriction is a rule that limits or qualifies something. It can be a limitation placed on the use or enjoyment of property, or a punishment in military law that involves moral and legal restraint rather than physical restraint. In patents, it refers to a ruling that a patent application has multiple distinct inventions and the applicant must choose one to continue pursuing. The requirement for restriction can be challenged or the applicant can abandon some of the original claims.

A more thorough explanation:

A requirement for restriction is a limitation or qualification placed on something. This can refer to:

  1. A limitation on the use or enjoyment of property, often found in a deed as a restrictive covenant.
  2. A military punishment that involves moral and legal restraint, rather than physical restraint. This is called a military restriction and is imposed by a commanding officer's nonjudicial punishment or by a court-martial.
  3. A ruling made by a patent examiner that a patent application contains two or more distinct inventions. The applicant must then choose one invention to continue prosecuting under the original application by abandoning some of the original claims.

For example, a homeowner may have a restriction on their property that prevents them from building any structures taller than two stories. This is a limitation on the use of their property. In the military, a soldier who has broken a rule may be given a restriction, which means they are not allowed to leave the base or ship they are stationed on. This is a form of punishment that restricts their freedom. In the case of a patent application, a requirement for restriction may be issued if the application contains multiple inventions. The applicant must then choose which invention to pursue and abandon the others.

requirement for division | requirements testing

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:44
My berkeley paragraph finally disappeared. I definitely think it is just an indicator that they are actively reviewing files, and does not mean anything about A, WL, or Rs
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:46
Also has anyone's date disappeared for W&L? Mine did last night
7:55
@WorthlessAttractiveZombie: mine did yesterday morning
7:56
Oops sorry I meant Vilanova. Mine disappeared last week
soapy
8:48
UMN under review! As predicted, decisions are gonna come out early December
Minus those random R decisions from UMN yesterday though right? I wonder what happened there. I don’t think I’ve seen a school start the season out with anything but As on here
almost all of my apps have been UR for 6 weeks at this point I feel exhausted waiting for them to finish
Irvine is being snobby and wont start any review until end of Nov.
Yeah, it’s tough. I’m distracting myself by playing good video games after work :)
im distracting myself by schizo-scrolling r/lawschoolamissions and every conceivable data point on this godforsaken website
it is not working
Haaa I naturally want to do that too. I’m trying to stop. They need a surgeon general’s warning on this site for perspective law students
i spend more time on here then anything else trying to rationalize that the waves from last year will match waves for this year (they won't) and that the stats of people with the same stats are indicative of my own (they aren't)
There aren't many people in my stat range so I pretty much know every result in my range after being on here for a few years
9:28
congrats on the 172 bruce
go dawgs fr
9:29
roll tide
do we foresee a fordham election day wave today (i'm delusional)
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:31
I think so, Jack
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
9:32
[kevin oleary]
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.