Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

responsive verdict

Read a random definition: right in personam

A quick definition of responsive verdict:

A verdict is a decision made by a jury or judge in a court case. It can be guilty or not guilty, or it can be a compromise verdict where some issues are conceded to avoid a deadlock. A responsive verdict is a specific type of verdict in civil law that answers the indictment with specific findings prescribed by statute, such as guilty, not guilty, or guilty of a lesser included offense. Other types of verdicts include directed verdicts, excessive verdicts, and split verdicts.

A more thorough explanation:

A responsive verdict is a finding or decision made by a jury or judge on the factual issues of a case. It is a verdict that properly answers the indictment with specific findings prescribed by statute, with possible findings being guilty, not guilty, and guilty of a lesser included offense.

For example, in a criminal case, a responsive verdict would be a finding of guilty or not guilty on the charges brought against the defendant. In a civil case, a responsive verdict would be a finding of liability or non-liability on the claims made by the plaintiff.

Responsive verdicts are important because they provide a clear and specific answer to the issues presented in a case. They help to ensure that justice is served and that the parties involved receive a fair and just outcome.

responsive action | res privatae

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:44
My berkeley paragraph finally disappeared. I definitely think it is just an indicator that they are actively reviewing files, and does not mean anything about A, WL, or Rs
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:46
Also has anyone's date disappeared for W&L? Mine did last night
7:55
@WorthlessAttractiveZombie: mine did yesterday morning
7:56
Oops sorry I meant Vilanova. Mine disappeared last week
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.