Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

responsive verdict

Read a random definition: fraud in the execution

A quick definition of responsive verdict:

A verdict is a decision made by a jury or judge in a court case. It can be guilty or not guilty, or it can be a compromise verdict where some issues are conceded to avoid a deadlock. A responsive verdict is a specific type of verdict in civil law that answers the indictment with specific findings prescribed by statute, such as guilty, not guilty, or guilty of a lesser included offense. Other types of verdicts include directed verdicts, excessive verdicts, and split verdicts.

A more thorough explanation:

A responsive verdict is a finding or decision made by a jury or judge on the factual issues of a case. It is a verdict that properly answers the indictment with specific findings prescribed by statute, with possible findings being guilty, not guilty, and guilty of a lesser included offense.

For example, in a criminal case, a responsive verdict would be a finding of guilty or not guilty on the charges brought against the defendant. In a civil case, a responsive verdict would be a finding of liability or non-liability on the claims made by the plaintiff.

Responsive verdicts are important because they provide a clear and specific answer to the issues presented in a case. They help to ensure that justice is served and that the parties involved receive a fair and just outcome.

responsive action | res privatae

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.