Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

restricted stock

Read a random definition: declaratory precedent

A quick definition of restricted stock:

Restricted stock refers to a type of stock that is given to an employee as part of their compensation package, but with certain restrictions on when they can sell or transfer the stock. These restrictions are usually time-based or performance-based, and are meant to incentivize the employee to stay with the company and work towards its success. Restricted stock is a type of security, which is a type of investment that represents ownership or creditor rights in a company or government entity. Securities have no intrinsic value on their own, but their value depends on the financial condition and prospects of the entity that issued them, as well as market demand.

A more thorough explanation:

Restricted stock is a type of security that represents ownership in a company. It is called "restricted" because there are limitations on when and how the stock can be sold or transferred.

For example, an employee may receive restricted stock as part of their compensation package. They cannot sell or transfer the stock until certain conditions are met, such as a certain amount of time passing or the company achieving certain performance goals.

Another example is when a company issues restricted stock to investors. The investors cannot sell or transfer the stock until the company goes public or is acquired by another company.

Restricted stock is different from regular stock because it comes with restrictions on when and how it can be sold or transferred. This can make it more valuable or less valuable than regular stock, depending on the circumstances.

restricted security | restricted surplus

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 2 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
17:16
hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.