Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

rule of law

Read a random definition: safe cracker

A quick definition of rule of law:

Rule of law: The idea that everyone must follow the same laws and be treated fairly by those laws. This means that no one, not even people in power, can break the law without consequences. It also means that judges make decisions based on the law, not their personal feelings or opinions. The rule of law helps to ensure that everyone is treated equally and that society is fair and just.

A more thorough explanation:

The rule of law is a legal principle that has several meanings:

  1. It means that everyone is subject to the law, including the government.
  2. It means that the law is supreme, and no one is above it.
  3. It means that the law is clear, predictable, and applied equally to everyone.
  4. It means that legal decisions are based on established principles and precedents, rather than on the whims of individuals.

For example, under the rule of law:

  • An employer is responsible for the actions of their employees while they are on the job.
  • Citizens must respect the law and cannot act arbitrarily or outside of the law.
  • Everyone within a jurisdiction is subject to the same laws, regardless of their status or position.
  • Legal decisions are based on established principles and precedents, rather than on the personal opinions of judges or other officials.

The rule of law is important because it ensures that everyone is treated fairly and equally under the law. It also helps to prevent abuses of power by those in positions of authority, and it provides a stable and predictable legal environment for individuals and businesses to operate in.

rule of justice | rule of marshaling assets

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.