Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

scandalum magnatum

Read a random definition: open court

A quick definition of scandalum magnatum:

Scandalum Magnatum: This is a fancy Latin term that means saying bad things about important people. It's really bad to say mean things about people who are powerful, like judges or government officials. Even if the things you say wouldn't be a big deal if you said them about a regular person, it's still really wrong to say them about someone important. In fact, it's so wrong that there are special laws to punish people who do it. The punishment can be going to jail or having to pay money to the person you said bad things about.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Scandalum magnatum is a Latin term used in law to refer to slanderous statements made about powerful people, such as judges, state officials, or peers. These statements are considered actionable, meaning they can be the basis for a lawsuit, and are seen as particularly heinous because they target individuals in positions of high rank and respect.

Example: If someone were to spread false rumors about a judge, claiming that they were corrupt or had accepted bribes, this would be an example of scandalum magnatum. Similarly, if someone were to make derogatory comments about a member of the royal family or a high-ranking government official, this would also be considered scandalum magnatum.

These examples illustrate the definition of scandalum magnatum because they involve false and damaging statements made about individuals who hold positions of power and authority. Such statements can have serious consequences, both for the individuals targeted and for the institutions they represent, which is why they are treated as a particularly serious form of slander.

scandalous subject matter | scarlet-letter punishment

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.