Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

sequatur sub suo periculo

Read a random definition: gross lease

A quick definition of sequatur sub suo periculo:

Term: SEQUATUR SUB SUO PERICULO

Definition: Sequatur sub suo periculo is a legal term that means "let him follow at his peril." It refers to a writ that is issued when a sheriff returns "nihil" (meaning nothing) to several summonses. Specifically, it is a writ that is issued after the sheriff returns "nihil" to a warrant ad warrantizandum and following an alias and a pluries writ. Another related term is "sicut alias," which refers to a second writ that is issued when the first one was not executed.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Sequatur sub suo periculo is a Latin term used in law that means "let him follow at his peril." It refers to a writ that is available when a sheriff returns "nihil" (meaning nothing) to several summonses. Specifically, it is a writ issued after the sheriff returns "nihil" to a warrant ad warrantizandum and following an alias and a pluries writ.

Example: If a sheriff is unable to find a defendant after being served with a writ, they may return "nihil" to the court. In this case, the court may issue a sequatur sub suo periculo writ, which means that the defendant is responsible for any consequences that may arise from not appearing in court.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the term sequatur sub suo periculo is used in law. If a defendant fails to appear in court after being served with a writ, they may be held responsible for any consequences that may arise from their absence. The sequatur sub suo periculo writ serves as a warning to the defendant that they are proceeding at their own risk.

Additional Example: Another example of the use of sequatur sub suo periculo is in cases where a defendant absconds, and the plaintiff would like to proceed to an outlawry against them. In this case, an original writ must be sued out regularly, and after that a capias. If the sheriff cannot find the defendant upon the first writ, an alias writ is issued, and after that a pluries, to the same effect as the former. Only after these words "we command you," this clause is inserted, "as we have formerly," or, "as we have often commanded you;" "sicut alias."

Explanation: This example further illustrates how the term sequatur sub suo periculo is used in law. It shows how the writ is issued after the sheriff returns "nihil" to a warrant ad warrantizandum and following an alias and a pluries writ. The example also shows how the term "sicut alias" is used in law to refer to a second writ issued when the first one was not executed.

separatum tenementum | sequela

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.