Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

sequatur sub suo periculo

Read a random definition: general instruction

A quick definition of sequatur sub suo periculo:

Term: SEQUATUR SUB SUO PERICULO

Definition: Sequatur sub suo periculo is a legal term that means "let him follow at his peril." It refers to a writ that is issued when a sheriff returns "nihil" (meaning nothing) to several summonses. Specifically, it is a writ that is issued after the sheriff returns "nihil" to a warrant ad warrantizandum and following an alias and a pluries writ. Another related term is "sicut alias," which refers to a second writ that is issued when the first one was not executed.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Sequatur sub suo periculo is a Latin term used in law that means "let him follow at his peril." It refers to a writ that is available when a sheriff returns "nihil" (meaning nothing) to several summonses. Specifically, it is a writ issued after the sheriff returns "nihil" to a warrant ad warrantizandum and following an alias and a pluries writ.

Example: If a sheriff is unable to find a defendant after being served with a writ, they may return "nihil" to the court. In this case, the court may issue a sequatur sub suo periculo writ, which means that the defendant is responsible for any consequences that may arise from not appearing in court.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the term sequatur sub suo periculo is used in law. If a defendant fails to appear in court after being served with a writ, they may be held responsible for any consequences that may arise from their absence. The sequatur sub suo periculo writ serves as a warning to the defendant that they are proceeding at their own risk.

Additional Example: Another example of the use of sequatur sub suo periculo is in cases where a defendant absconds, and the plaintiff would like to proceed to an outlawry against them. In this case, an original writ must be sued out regularly, and after that a capias. If the sheriff cannot find the defendant upon the first writ, an alias writ is issued, and after that a pluries, to the same effect as the former. Only after these words "we command you," this clause is inserted, "as we have formerly," or, "as we have often commanded you;" "sicut alias."

Explanation: This example further illustrates how the term sequatur sub suo periculo is used in law. It shows how the writ is issued after the sheriff returns "nihil" to a warrant ad warrantizandum and following an alias and a pluries writ. The example also shows how the term "sicut alias" is used in law to refer to a second writ issued when the first one was not executed.

separatum tenementum | sequela

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.