Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

shop

Read a random definition: replead

A quick definition of shop:

A shop is a place where people work to make or sell things. It can be a factory, office, or store. There are different types of shops, like a union shop where all workers must be part of a union, or an open shop where workers can choose to be in a union or not. Some shops give preference to union members or non-union members when hiring.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A business establishment or place of employment. It can refer to a factory, office, or any other place of business.

There are different types of shops:

  • Open shop: A shop in which the employer hires workers without regard to union affiliation.
  • Union shop: A shop in which the employer may hire nonunion employees on the condition that they join a union within a specified time (usually at least 30 days).
  • Closed shop: A shop in which the employer, by agreement with a union, hires and retains in employment only union members in good standing. Closed shops were made illegal under the federal Labor–Management Relations Act.
  • Agency shop: A shop in which a union acts as an agent for the employees, regardless of their union membership. Nonunion members must pay union dues because it is presumed that any collective bargaining will benefit nonunion as well as union members.

For example, if a company is an open shop, it means that they do not require their employees to be part of a union. On the other hand, if a company is a union shop, they will only hire employees who are part of a union or who agree to join one within a certain period of time.

These different types of shops can have a big impact on the relationship between employers and employees, as well as on the power of labor unions.

shock the conscience | shop-book rule

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.