Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

slander per se

Read a random definition: policy loan

A quick definition of slander per se:

Slander per se is a type of spoken defamation that is so harmful that the person who said it can be sued without having to prove that the statement caused any specific harm. This type of slander includes accusations of committing a serious crime, having a contagious disease, doing something that would hurt someone's business or profession, or being sexually promiscuous. Other types of slander may require the person who was harmed to prove that they suffered specific damages as a result of the statement.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Slander per se is a type of slander that does not require proof of actual damages because it involves statements that are so harmful that they are considered inherently damaging.

For example, if someone falsely accuses another person of committing a crime involving moral turpitude, such as theft or fraud, that would be considered slander per se. Similarly, if someone spreads rumors that a person has a sexually transmitted disease or has engaged in unchaste behavior, that would also be considered slander per se.

The reason why slander per se is treated differently from other types of slander is that the harm caused by these statements is so severe that it is assumed that the victim has suffered damages without needing to prove them in court.

Overall, slander per se is a serious form of defamation that can have significant consequences for both the victim and the person making the false statements.

slander per quod | SLAPP

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.