Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

spontaneous exclamation

Read a random definition: delegate

A quick definition of spontaneous exclamation:

A spontaneous exclamation is a statement made in the middle of a surprising event, without any planning or thinking beforehand. These statements are important in court because they are exceptions to the rule that out-of-court statements cannot be used as evidence. This is because they are made in a situation where the speaker cannot plan or make up what they say. To be considered a spontaneous exclamation, the statement must be made right after the event, refer to the event, be made by someone who saw the event, and be made so quickly that the speaker did not have time to think about it. Even if the statement is made in response to a question, it can still be considered a spontaneous exclamation. However, some people may challenge the use of these statements in court because they violate the right to confront one's accuser.

A more thorough explanation:

A spontaneous exclamation, also known as an excited utterance, is a statement made in the heat of the moment, without any planning or thinking beforehand. These statements are important in legal cases because they are an exception to the hearsay rule, which usually prevents out-of-court statements from being used as evidence in court. Spontaneous exclamations are allowed because they are made in the moment and cannot be fabricated or planned.

For a statement to be considered a spontaneous exclamation, it must meet certain criteria. First, it must be made in response to a startling event. Second, it must refer to the event that just occurred. Third, the person making the statement must have witnessed the event. Finally, the statement must be made immediately after the event, without any time for the person to think or plan what they will say.

For example, if someone witnesses a car accident and immediately says "Oh my God, that was so scary!" that statement could be considered a spontaneous exclamation. It was made in response to a startling event, refers to the event, was made by someone who witnessed the event, and was made immediately after the event.

However, there is no strict time limit for how long after an event a statement can still be considered a spontaneous exclamation. It is up to the judge to decide if a statement meets the criteria. For example, if someone calls the police half an hour after being kidnapped and makes a statement about what happened, that statement could still be considered a spontaneous exclamation if the person was still under stress from the event and had no time to plan what they would say.

It is important to note that the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment can sometimes be used to challenge the admissibility of spontaneous exclamations in criminal cases. This clause gives defendants the right to confront their accusers in court, which can be difficult if the accuser's statement is considered a spontaneous exclamation and cannot be cross-examined.

Sponsorship disclosure | Sports law

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.