Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Springing executory interest

Read a random definition: residuary devisee

A quick definition of Springing executory interest:

A springing executory interest is a type of future interest that comes into effect after the grantor's interest ends. It's like a surprise gift that you only get after someone else has finished using it.

A more thorough explanation:

Springing executory interest

A type of future interest that becomes effective only when a specific event occurs, and it follows an interest that the grantor held.

For example, a grantor may convey a piece of property to their child, but only when the child graduates from college. Until the child graduates, the grantor retains ownership of the property. Once the child graduates, the ownership of the property "springs" from the grantor to the child, creating an executory interest.

Another example is a grantor conveying a piece of property to a charity, but only if the charity uses the property for a specific purpose, such as building a community center. If the charity fails to use the property for the specified purpose, the ownership of the property "springs" back to the grantor or to another designated party.

Springing executory interests are future interests that "spring" into effect only when a specific event occurs. These interests follow an interest that the grantor held, and they can be used to ensure that property is used for a specific purpose or that ownership is transferred only when certain conditions are met. The examples illustrate how a springing executory interest works in practice, showing how ownership of property can be transferred or retained based on specific conditions.

springing durable power of attorney | springing interest

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.