Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States (1911)

Read a random definition: quae functionem recipiunt

A quick definition of Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States (1911):

Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States (1911) was a court case where the U.S. Supreme Court found that Standard Oil Company, a big oil company, broke the law by doing things that made it hard for other companies to compete with them. This is called a monopoly. The court ordered that the company be split up into smaller parts. The company was owned by the Rockefeller family, who controlled almost all of the oil market in the U.S. The court said that this was not fair to other companies and people who needed oil. The court also said that the government has the power to make laws to stop companies from doing things that hurt competition.

A more thorough explanation:

Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States (1911) was a case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. The case found that Standard Oil Company, a major oil conglomerate in the early 20th century, violated the Sherman Antitrust Act through anticompetitive actions, specifically forming a monopoly. The court ordered that the company be geographically split.

The Standard Oil Company of New Jersey was a holding company owned by the Rockefeller family. The family organized their oil empire by creating holding companies in many of the jurisdictions in which they operated. In total, the Rockefeller family and their holding companies controlled almost the entire petroleum market in the U.S. To further their control over the petroleum market, the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey had acquired nearly all of the oil refining companies in the United States.

The United States brought suit against the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, alleging that it violated the Sherman Antitrust Act because its acquisitions were an undue restraint of trade. The Court ruled that Congress had the power to pass the Sherman Antitrust Act under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. It then ruled that “restraint of trade” included monopolistic behavior, and only unduly restrained trade if it led to higher prices, reduced output, or reduced quality. The Court found that Standard Oil of New Jersey’s actions led to these consequences and therefore violated the Sherman Antitrust Act.

For example, if a company owned all the gas stations in a town and raised prices significantly, that would be an example of a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The company's actions would be considered anticompetitive and would lead to higher prices for consumers.

standard of care | Standing

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:22
The reason why today’s Image-Fiction isn’t the rescue from a passive, addictive TV-psychology that it tries so hard to be is that most Image-Fiction writers render their material with the same tone of irony and self-consciousness that their ancestors, the literary insurgents of Beat and postmodernism, used so effectively to rebel against their own world and context. And the reason why this irreverent postmodern approach fails to help the new Imagists transfigure TV is simply that TV has beaten the new Imagists to the punch.
Quillinit
16:26
idk lsd status checker button hasn't worked for me this whole cycle so far
i just noticed i sent an email to an adcom and spelled their last name wrong...
how cooked am I?
rip king
some adcoms don’t care some are very persnickety about that kind of thing
automatic R
im done. this cycle isn't even fully started and im already spiraling
hasn't
mandatory little treat day today
get yourself something yummy
i already had a little silly drink...
hahaha okok
get one for me. to celebrate my R
some adcoms legit don’t care could be fine
i hope so :')
17:41
i tried Oreo coke zero
thoughts?
17:41
actually pretty good, like Coke Zero with a faint chocolate taste
do you feel like the drake sprite comercial?
17:42
i would never feel like drake
17:42
that’s just me though
not like drake per se, but the drake sprite commercial as a whole
17:43
ontologically I would never feel like a commercial featuring drake or the emotions represented therein
17:43
that’s just me though
the lsat has done irreparable damage to the brightest minds of our generation
bunny scroll up and tell me what you think about my problem
17:52
they don’t care! people make mistakes. you’re so fine
17:52
also I talked like this before I ever even thought about going to law school
1a2b3c4d26z
18:20
HOWL REFERNCE
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.