Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Standing

Read a random definition: good offices

A quick definition of Standing:

Standing, also known as locus standi, is the ability of a person or group to bring a lawsuit to court. In order to have standing, the person or group must have suffered or will suffer direct harm that can be fixed by the court. This means that they must have a real problem that the court can solve. In federal court, the harm must be related to a constitutional issue and not just because someone is unhappy with a government action or law. The Supreme Court has a three-part test to determine if someone has standing to sue: they must have suffered a real injury, there must be a connection between the injury and the issue brought to court, and the court must be able to fix the injury.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Standing, also known as locus standi, refers to the legal capacity of a party to bring a lawsuit in court.

In state courts, the laws of each state determine what constitutes standing. Generally, plaintiffs must have suffered or will suffer direct harm or injury, and this harm must be capable of being redressed.

In federal courts, legal actions cannot be brought simply because an individual or group is unhappy with a government action or law. Federal courts only have the constitutional authority to resolve actual disputes, known as a "case or controversy."

The Supreme Court has established a three-part test to determine whether a party has standing to sue in federal court:

  1. The plaintiff must have suffered an "injury in fact," which means the injury is of a legally protected interest that is concrete and actual or imminent.
  2. There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct brought before the court.
  3. A favorable decision by the court must be likely, rather than speculative, to redress the injury.

An example of standing in state court would be a person who was injured in a car accident bringing a lawsuit against the driver who caused the accident. The plaintiff has suffered direct harm, and the harm can be redressed by the court ordering the driver to pay damages.

An example of standing in federal court would be a group of environmental activists bringing a lawsuit against a company for polluting a river. The plaintiffs must show that they have suffered a concrete and particularized injury, such as being unable to fish in the polluted river, and that the company's actions caused this harm. They must also show that a favorable decision by the court, such as ordering the company to clean up the river, is likely to redress their injury.

Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States (1911) | Star chamber proceedings

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.