Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

stare decisis

Read a random definition: layperson

A quick definition of stare decisis:

Stare decisis is a fancy Latin term that means courts have to follow the decisions made by other courts before them. This helps make sure that the law is consistent and fair. If a court has already decided on a similar case, the new court will usually make the same decision. This is called "precedent." There are two types of stare decisis: horizontal (when a court follows its own previous decisions) and vertical (when a court follows decisions made by higher courts). Sometimes, if a previous decision was really bad or doesn't work anymore, a court can decide not to follow it. But usually, courts have to follow what other courts have already decided.

A more thorough explanation:

Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that means "to stand by things decided" in Latin. It is the principle that courts will follow previous court decisions when deciding similar cases. This helps to promote consistency and predictability in the legal system.

Horizontal stare decisis refers to a court following its own previous decisions. For example, if the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals follows a ruling it made in a previous case, that is horizontal stare decisis.

Vertical stare decisis refers to a court following the decisions of higher courts. For example, if the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals follows a ruling made by the U.S. Supreme Court, that is vertical stare decisis.

Although courts usually follow precedent, there are exceptions. If a previous decision is unworkable or badly reasoned, the court may not follow it. This is particularly true in constitutional cases. For example, in Brown v. Board of Education, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to follow the precedent set by Plessy v. Ferguson.

Suppose a court is deciding a case involving the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. If a previous court has already ruled on a similar case and found that the search was unreasonable, the current court will likely follow that decision. This is an example of stare decisis in action.

Star chamber proceedings | Starker exchange

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
lilypadfrog
8:12
hi shawties
lilypadfrog
8:16
who’s getting into a law school today raise your hand
jackfrost11770
8:28
I sure hope so at this point
lilypadfrog
8:28
woooo
lilypadfrog
8:28
jackfrost for law school
jackfrost11770
8:29
LILYPADFROG FOR LAW SCHOOL
jackfrost11770
8:29
I really just love how now there's an executive order that says I don't exist as a person
jackfrost11770
8:29
Do I not have to pay taxes now? Loans? What now
lilypadfrog
8:34
you should probably assume this means your law school will be free
GreyCeaselessMammoth
8:34
i love that there's an executive order that we're all female now
jackfrost11770
8:38
I think so yeah. I think I don't have to pay for anything anymore
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.