Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

State Action Requirement

Read a random definition: mortgage clause

A quick definition of State Action Requirement:

The state action requirement means that if someone wants to sue over a law being broken, they have to prove that the government did it, not a regular person or business. This only applies when the law says the government has to be involved. For example, the First Amendment says the government can't take away our freedom of speech or religion, so only the government can violate that. Discrimination is also only against the law if the government is involved.

A more thorough explanation:

The state action requirement is a legal rule that says a plaintiff (someone who brings a lawsuit) must show that the government (local, state, or federal) was responsible for violating a law, rather than a private person or company. This rule only applies when the law in question requires the government to have acted.

For example, the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution says that Congress cannot make any law that limits freedom of speech or religion. This means that a private person or company cannot violate the First Amendment. Only the government can violate this law by passing a law that limits free speech or religion.

Another example is discrimination. Discrimination is wrong, but it only violates the Constitution if it can be attributed to state action. This means that a private person or company cannot violate the Constitution by discriminating against someone. Only the government can violate the Constitution by passing a law that discriminates against a group of people.

The state action requirement is important because it helps protect individual rights and limits the power of the government. It ensures that the government is held accountable for its actions and that individuals can seek justice when their rights are violated.

State action antitrust immunity | State court

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.