Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

State Action Requirement

Read a random definition: parallel citation

A quick definition of State Action Requirement:

The state action requirement means that if someone wants to sue over a law being broken, they have to prove that the government did it, not a regular person or business. This only applies when the law says the government has to be involved. For example, the First Amendment says the government can't take away our freedom of speech or religion, so only the government can violate that. Discrimination is also only against the law if the government is involved.

A more thorough explanation:

The state action requirement is a legal rule that says a plaintiff (someone who brings a lawsuit) must show that the government (local, state, or federal) was responsible for violating a law, rather than a private person or company. This rule only applies when the law in question requires the government to have acted.

For example, the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution says that Congress cannot make any law that limits freedom of speech or religion. This means that a private person or company cannot violate the First Amendment. Only the government can violate this law by passing a law that limits free speech or religion.

Another example is discrimination. Discrimination is wrong, but it only violates the Constitution if it can be attributed to state action. This means that a private person or company cannot violate the Constitution by discriminating against someone. Only the government can violate the Constitution by passing a law that discriminates against a group of people.

The state action requirement is important because it helps protect individual rights and limits the power of the government. It ensures that the government is held accountable for its actions and that individuals can seek justice when their rights are violated.

State action antitrust immunity | State court

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.