Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

strict construction

Read a random definition: direct payment

A quick definition of strict construction:

Strict construction is a way of reading and understanding laws. It means that judges should only use the exact words written in the law to make decisions. They should not try to guess what the lawmakers meant or add their own ideas. This is different from liberal construction, where judges can use their own ideas to interpret the law. In criminal cases, strict construction is especially important because it helps make sure that people are not punished for things that are not clearly against the law.

A more thorough explanation:

Strict construction is a way of interpreting laws. It means that judges should only apply the exact words of a law, without considering other possible meanings. This is the opposite of liberal construction, which allows judges to consider the overall purpose of a law when interpreting it.

In criminal law, strict construction is especially important. This is because of the rule of lenity, which says that if a law is unclear, it should be interpreted in favor of the defendant. By using strict construction, judges can make sure that defendants are not punished for things that are not clearly illegal.

For example, let's say there is a law that says "it is illegal to carry a weapon in a government building." If someone is caught carrying a knife in a courthouse, a strict constructionist judge would say that the person is guilty, because a knife is a weapon and a courthouse is a government building. A liberal constructionist judge might say that the law was meant to prevent people from bringing guns into government buildings, and that carrying a small knife for self-defense should not be illegal.

Streets and highways - State statutes | Strict Liability

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.