Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Strict Liability

Read a random definition: res privatae

A quick definition of Strict Liability :

Strict liability is when someone is held responsible for something they did, even if they didn't mean to do it. This can apply to both criminal and civil cases. For example, if someone has a dangerous animal and it hurts someone, they can be held strictly liable for the harm caused. Some people think this is unfair, but others believe it helps keep people safe.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Strict liability is a legal concept where a person can be held responsible for their actions, even if they did not intend to cause harm. This applies to both criminal and civil cases.

  • Criminal Law: Possession crimes and statutory rape are examples of strict liability offenses. This means that a person can be charged with these crimes even if they did not know they were breaking the law.
  • Tort Law: Possession of certain animals and abnormally dangerous activities are examples of activities for which a plaintiff may be held strictly liable. For example, if someone owns a wild animal and it attacks someone, they can be held responsible for the harm caused, even if they did not intend for the animal to attack.
  • Products Liability: In the area of torts known as products liability, there is a sub-category known as strict products liability which applies when a defective product for which an appropriate defendant holds responsibility causes injury to an appropriate plaintiff. For example, if a company sells a product that is defective and it causes harm to someone, they can be held responsible for the harm caused, even if they did not intend for the product to be defective.

These examples illustrate how strict liability can be applied in different areas of law. In each case, the person or company can be held responsible for their actions, even if they did not intend to cause harm. This is because strict liability focuses on the harm caused, rather than the intent of the person or company.

strict construction | Strict scrutiny

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.