Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

strict products liability

Read a random definition: bigamy

A quick definition of strict products liability:

Strict products liability is when a company is responsible for any harm caused by a defective product they made or sold. This means that if someone is hurt by a product that was not made correctly, the company that made or sold it can be held responsible. To prove strict products liability, the person who was hurt must show that the product was dangerous, that the company was in the business of selling products, that the product was defective, and that the defect caused the injury. This is a way to make sure that companies are careful when making and selling products so that people are safe when using them.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Strict products liability is a legal theory that holds manufacturers and sellers responsible for any damages or injuries caused by a defective product. This liability can be based on negligence, breach of warranty, or strict liability.

Example: If a person buys a toaster and it malfunctions, causing a fire that damages their home, the manufacturer of the toaster can be held strictly liable for the damages. The buyer does not need to prove that the manufacturer was negligent or breached a warranty, only that the product was defective and caused the damage.

This example illustrates how strict products liability works. The manufacturer is held responsible for the defective product, regardless of whether they were negligent or not. This helps protect consumers from harm caused by faulty products and encourages manufacturers to ensure their products are safe.

stricto jure | strict settlement

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
above their median for everything chat i'm ending it
I applied NYU on October 8th like r give up right?
16:46
wtf
16:47
i'd reach out to their admissions and check up on it
I did 2x and they said "The vast majority of candidates who have submitted their complete application by our deadline will be notified by the last day of April"
like kinda fucked
16:50
ugh that's so annoying
law schools that ghost should give you your money back
or reject
like man GIVE IT BACK!!!!
ClassyPleasantHeron
16:56
Schools explicitly asking applicants to retake the LSAT are TTTs pretending to be 2nd tier.
LMAOOO
like man oklahoma more like oklahowaboutyoueatmyshoe
me when that person on reddit said UofU wave and it's.... 3 people
help who just posted that right after I started bitching in chat
my heart fell straight into my ass mind u
and i just got a fucking app status tracker update... not for UofU... my BP is so spiked rn
QuarrelsomeTurkey
18:29
does anyone know if bu ever releases after 5 pm
Lol @jupitersmoons It feels like UofU is screwing with us haha
fr like I know it"s Mountain Time but bestie we have less than half an hour before typical EOD
what we doing
Real
19:17
new COAs are out
19:37
Anyone know how long it takes to get aid package after getting admitted to UChicago or Northwestern?
I’d ask in the t14 chat bc lol it may be a bit until you can get someone who can answer that question here
21:19
@syddak: Oof tough spot. Congrats on the As. Did either indicate either via email/mail that they would be following up with aid, and if so, did they provide a time frame? It may be acceptable to email them and indicate seat deposits are fast approaching and you are curious if you can expect further info (aid) from the school to aid u in ur decision..
0:26
@UnderRepresentedTryhard: that’s a greater than sign. Meaning outside t14
0:27
Schools>t14
IrishDinosaur
13:38
I'm convinced USC doesn't really exist
IrishDinosaur
13:38
it's an elaborate hoax
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.