Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Products liability

Read a random definition: vindicate

A quick definition of Products liability:

Products liability refers to the legal responsibility of anyone involved in the making and selling of a product for any harm caused by that product. This includes the manufacturer, assembler, wholesaler, and retailer. If a product has a defect that causes harm to someone who uses it, that person can sue for damages. This can include physical products, like toys or cars, as well as intangible things like gas or even pets. There are different types of claims that can be made, depending on the circumstances, and there are three types of defects that can create liability: design defects, manufacturing defects, and defects in marketing. Products liability is generally considered a strict liability offense, which means that the defendant can be held responsible even if they didn't intend to cause harm.

A more thorough explanation:

Products liability refers to the legal responsibility of anyone involved in the manufacturing and distribution of a product for any harm caused by that product. This includes the manufacturer of component parts, the assembling manufacturer, the wholesaler, and the retail store owner. If a product has a defect that causes harm to a consumer or someone who uses the product, it can be the subject of a products liability lawsuit.

Products liability can apply to a wide range of products, including tangible personal property, intangibles like gas, naturals like pets, real estate like houses, and even writings like navigational charts. Products liability is mainly derived from torts law.

For a commercial seller of a defective product, the following elements must be present:

  • The defendant sold a product that the plaintiff used
  • The defendant is the commercial seller of such a product
  • The plaintiff suffered an injury
  • When the defendant sold the item, the item was defective
  • The defect was an actual and proximate cause of the plaintiff's injury

Products liability claims can be based on negligence, strict liability, or breach of warranty of fitness. The type of claim will depend on the jurisdiction where the claim is based, as there is no federal products liability law. The lack of uniformity has led to the publication of the Model Uniform Products Liability Act (MUPLA) to encourage uniform procedures for products liability tort.

There are three types of product defects that can incur liability in manufacturers and suppliers:

  • Design Defects: These are inherent and exist before the product is manufactured. While the item might serve its purpose well, it can be unreasonably dangerous to use due to a design flaw.
  • Manufacturing Defects: These occur during the construction or production of the item. Only a few out of many products of the same type are flawed in this case.
  • Defects in Marketing: These deal with improper instructions and failures to warn consumers of latent dangers in the product.

Products Liability is generally considered a strict liability offense. This means that a defendant is liable when the plaintiff proves that the product is defective, regardless of the defendant's intent. It is irrelevant whether the manufacturer or supplier exercised great care; if there is a defect in the product that causes harm, they will be liable for it.

Even when a product is defective due to a design flaw, some courts will use one of two tests to find that the defendant has no liability:

  • Risk-Utility Test: The defendant is not liable for a design defect if evidence shows that the product’s utility outweighs its inherent risk of harm.
  • Consumer Expectation Test: A reasonable consumer would find the product defective when using the product in a reasonable manner. If a reasonable consumer would not find the product to be defective even when using it in a reasonable manner, then the defendant is not liable, even if the product's design flaw resulted in injury.

Products liability cases can involve defendants and plaintiffs from a large number of jurisdictions, due to the number of steps required in the creation of a product and the resulting large number of people who use a given product. Due to the large number of people who may be involved in products liability cases, plaintiffs often forum shop to find judges sympathetic to products liability claims. In Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California (2017), the Supreme Court limited the forum-shopping ability of plaintiffs in products liability cases.

product liability | Professional corporation

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:05
@WorthlessAttractiveZombie: My legal address says I am from NJ but I live in CA.
14:06
I have no business applying based on my stats but its where I went to undergrad
14:07
Has anyone not heard back from any schools and is pushing two months in a couple weeks?
Wait gulc wave would go crazy
1a2b3c4d26z
14:15
I love that someone went through the effort of making that post
1a2b3c4d26z
14:17
Nvm their previous posts are hilarious
HopefullyInLawSchool
14:18
Ya this guy is really funny and smart like omg hes just the best
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
14:19
I wonder if they go to the university of YM
HopefullyInLawSchool
14:19
His Irl name is Joe M.
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
14:20
Davis needs to stop playing
HopefullyInLawSchool
14:21
I got two A's today, but my hunger is never ending
14:21
give me UC Davis
babycat
14:22
just straight up evil
hey all good morning
are we expecting any waves today?
HopefullyInLawSchool
14:24
Maybe Pepperdine
HopefullyInLawSchool
14:24
But I think more will arrive tomorrow
babycat
14:24
no one wants to talk about how GULC’s accommodations office is evil with me?
babycat
14:25
GULC to a pregnant 2L who requested final exam accommodations for the week she is expected to give birth: "Motherhood is not for the Faint of Heart."
babycat
14:25
can you imagine
14:25
that's insane
I think it's ridiculous sometimes how schools want to act like we're adults but then won't treat us like them sometimes.
It's like you either want to let us all sit at the adult table or just leave as at the kiddy table.
HopefullyInLawSchool
14:26
Universities are filled with old incompetent people that dont understand really basic human shit
HopefullyInLawSchool
14:27
its because their status has been secured for decades
HopefullyInLawSchool
14:27
(school admin ego in general)
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
14:29
GULC said that? University of Tennessee offers daycare and has single parent clubs where they will help with babysitting and work with you to schedule exams. Talked to an ambassador who had a single mom of 3 in her class and the school helped best they could
babycat
14:29
“faint of heart” is killing me how callous do you have to be to say something like that?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.