Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

summary probate

Read a random definition: statute law

A quick definition of summary probate:

Summary probate is a simpler way to distribute certain estates after someone dies. It's available in most states and is used for estates that are under a certain amount of money and don't have a personal representative. For example, in California, if an estate is worth less than $50,000 and there's no personal representative, the public administrator can take control and distribute the estate quickly. To avoid summary probate, it's best to name a personal representative in your will. If you don't name one, the public administrator may still be able to distribute your estate quickly.

A more thorough explanation:

Summary probate is a simpler way to distribute certain estates after someone dies. It is available in most states and is used for estates that are under a certain dollar amount and do not have a personal representative.

In California, if an estate does not have a personal representative and the public administrator takes control of the estate, they may use summary probate to distribute the estate. However, the value of the property in the estate cannot exceed $50,000. If the estate is worth more than that, summary probate cannot be used.

To avoid summary probate, it is important to name a personal representative in your will. If you do not name a personal representative, the public administrator may still use summary probate to distribute your estate, even if you have a will.

For example, in California, if your will does not name an executor, the public administrator can still use summary probate to distribute your estate.

Overall, summary probate is a simpler and faster way to distribute certain estates, but it is important to understand the rules and limitations of summary probate in your state.

Summary Judgment | summation

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.