Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

taking of hostages

Read a random definition: legal injury

A quick definition of taking of hostages:

Term: Taking of Hostages

Definition: Taking hostages means capturing people and holding them against their will. This is a very bad thing to do, especially during a war. It is considered a war crime, which means it is against the law. To prove that someone has committed this crime, the prosecutor must show that the person took the victim(s) hostage, threatened to hurt them, and wanted something in return for their release. The victims must also be protected under special rules called the Geneva Conventions, and the crime must have happened during an international war.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Taking of hostages is a war crime that occurs when someone seizes, detains, or holds someone else hostage as part of an armed conflict. The person holding the hostages threatens to harm or kill them if their demands are not met. The goal is to force a state, international organization, or individuals to act or refrain from acting in a certain way in exchange for the safety or release of the hostages. This conduct is only considered a war crime if it takes place in the context of an international armed conflict and the victims are protected under the Geneva Conventions of 1949.

Examples:

  • A group of rebels in a war-torn country kidnaps a group of aid workers and demands that the government release their imprisoned comrades in exchange for their release.
  • A terrorist organization hijacks a plane and threatens to kill the passengers unless their political demands are met.

These examples illustrate how taking hostages is used as a tactic to achieve certain goals in an armed conflict. The perpetrators use the hostages as leverage to force others to comply with their demands. This is a violation of international law and is considered a war crime.

taking against the will | Taking the Fifth

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.